PerceptionAre the circumstances such that having a percept P is not a reliable indicator of P?MemoryIs P originally based on beliefs of which one is false?Is P not originally believed for other reasons?Does the agent who recalls P express doubt about P?Statistical SyllogismIs it the case that, 'c is also an H', and 'things that are also H are not usually G'?InductionTemporal persistenceIs not-P true at some T3 between T1 and T2?General KnowledgeWitness TestimonyIs witness W truthful?Statutory rule applicationIs the rule valid?Is the rule applicable to the case at hand?default rule application Is the rule applicable to the case at hand?is the rule sufficiently backed?counts as ruleIs the rule applicable to the case at hand?Argument A1
(1) I owned the tent at t1, so
(2) I own the tent now at t3. Furthermore,
(3) defendant holds the tent,
(4) I involuntarily lost possession of the tent at t1,
So by Section 2014,2 BW
(5) defendant must return the tent to me.
Argument A2
(6) I bought the tent at t2 from V at a price of fl. 850,
(7) V delivered the tent to me at t2. Furthermore,
(8) my wife did domestic work for van der Velde valued fl. 850, so
(9) I paid the sales price;
so I obtained the tent in possession in good faith at t2,
so by 2014, 1 BW
(10) I became owner of the tent at t2, so
(11) I now own the tent at t3. Furthermore,
(12) plaintiff has no other right to the tent, so
(13) I do not have to return the
tent.
Argument A3
(14) My son occupied the tent at t1,
(15) I and my family held the tent in normal use from obtaining the tent to t1, so,
(16) I held the tent at t1.
So, by the presumption of 590 BW,
(17) I had possession of the tent at t1, so,
by the presumption of 589 BW,
(18) I had possession in good faith of the tent at t1, so,
by the presumption of 2014,1 BW,
(1) I owned the tent at t1.
Argument A4
(19) 2014,2 BW is an exception to 2014,1 BW,
so, by Lex Specialis,
(20) 2014,2 BW prevails over 2014,1 BW.
Argument A5
(14) My son occupied the tent at t1,
(15) I and my family held the tent in normal use from obtaining the tent to t1,
(21) violent events
at t1, so,
(4) I involuntarily lost possession of the tent at t1.
Argument A6
(22) Nieborg obtained the tent on loan from V., so,
(23) Nieborg started holding the tent for someone else, so
(24) 590 BW does not apply.
Argument A7
(25) t1 is in the past,
(26) 2014, 1 BW does not apply to past events,
so (27) 2014,1 BW is not applicable.
Argument A8
(28) premises,
so (29) 2014, 1 BW also applies to past events.
null2007-11-23(5) defendant must return the tent to me.
(2) I own the tent now at t3.(1) I owned the tent at t1(18) I had possession in good faith of the tent at t1(17) I had possession of the tent at t1(16) I held the tent at t1.
(14) My son occupied the tent at t1(15) I and my family held the tent in normal use from obtaining the tent to t1by the presumption of 590 BWby the presumption of 589 BWthe presumption of 2014,1 BW(3) defendant holds the tent,
(4) I involuntarily lost possession of the tent at t1,
(14) My son occupied the tent at t1,(15) I and my family held the tent in normal use from obtaining the tent to t1(21) violent events
at t1Section 2014,2 BW