Some common errors exhibited by students in interpreting graphs in physics are illustrated by examples from kinematics. These are taken from the results of a descriptive study extending over a period of several years and involving several hundred university students who were enrolled in a laboratory-based preparatory physics course. The study is partly motivated by the conviction that facility in drawing and interpreting graphs is of critical importance for developing and understanding many topics in physics.
Subsequent testing indicated that the graphing errors made by this group of students are not idiosyncratic, but are found in different populations and across different levels of sophistication. This paper examines two categories of difficulty identified in the investigation: difficulty in connecting graphs to physical concepts and difficulty in connecting graphs to the real world. Specific difficulties in each category are discussed in terms of student performance on written problems and laboratory experiments. A few of the instructional strategies that have been designed to address some of these difficulties are described.
Difficulties associated with connecting graphs to the real world are:
Instructional strategies that have been designed to address some of these difficulties are:
Belangrijk artikel waarbij problemen van leerlingen met kinematica en grafieken op een rijtje staan. Nadruk ligt op grafieken, vanwege ervaringen met een eerdere benadering (zie See Rosenquist, Mark L. and Lillian C. McDermott ). Problemen lijken voor een deel voort te komen uit het gebruik van continue grafieken en snelle introductie van begrippen als een vierkantje onder een v-t-grafiek staat voor een afgelegde afstand. De oplossingen zoeken ze vooral in type vraagstellingen en probleemsituaties, echter niet in de manier waarop leerlingen leren betekenis te geven aan helling en oppervlakte (bijvoorbeeld via discrete grafieken).